New Water-Saving Toilets

February 1, 2002

LVT Number: 15620

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on the building-wide installation of water-saving toilets. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenant appealed, claiming that the old toilets didn't need replacement. The DHCR ruled against tenant. Landlord's installation qualified as an MCI, conserved water and money and, in some places, is now required.

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on the building-wide installation of water-saving toilets. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenant appealed, claiming that the old toilets didn't need replacement. The DHCR ruled against tenant. Landlord's installation qualified as an MCI, conserved water and money and, in some places, is now required.

Costigan: DHCR Admin. Rev. Dckt. No. PJ710003RT (12/7/01) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

PJ710003RT.pdf206.31 KB

Topics

More like this