Application to Substitute Security Cameras for Doorman Denied
LVT Number: 19243
Landlord asked the DHCR for permission to eliminate its doorman/lobby attendant services and substitute security cameras. The DRA ruled against landlord. Landlord appealed and lost. First, landlord didn't prove that the doorman service had become expensive, as claimed. Second, although landlord identified where it would install cameras, it didn't mention that any employees would be stationed to monitor the video cameras.
731-759 St. Marks Ave.: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket No. TB230046RO 9/1/06 [2-pg. doc.]