Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on the installation of a new roof with related coping and masonry work. The DRA ruled for landlord in part, but disallowed $5,000 for masonry work. Landlord appealed and lost...
Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on roof work, including work performed on the building roof terrace. The DHCR ruled for landlord. Tenants filed an Article 78 court appeal, and the case was reopened for...
Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes for exterior restoration work. The DRA ruled for landlord in part, but disallowed any increase for pointing/masonry, balcony repair, consulting architect, and heat computer. The...
Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on front facade and stoop restoration. The DRA ruled against landlord, who appealed and lost. The work consisted of patching and repair to the brownstone exterior of the...
Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on the installation of windows on a building-wide basis. The DRA ruled against landlord, finding that the work didn't qualify as a major capital improvement. Landlord...
Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on pointing and waterproofing, a new roof, and the installation of a new retaining wall. The DRA ruled for landlord in part, but disallowed any increase for the retaining...
Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on building-wide rewiring. The DRA ruled against landlord because no feeders were installed. Landlord appealed and won, based on DHCR inspection that found that new risers...
Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on the installation of a new sidewalk in front of the building. The DRA ruled against landlord, who appealed and lost. Resurfacing of an entire courtyard and walkways within...
Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes for the installation of new entrance and lobby doors, as well as a new video-intercom system. The DRA ruled for landlord in part, but disallowed any increase for the intercom...
Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on a building-wide improvement. The DRA ruled against landlord because there was a hazardous lead-based paint violation on file with HPD. Landlord appealed and lost. Landlord...
