Tenant Didn't Provide Access for DRA Inspection

LVT Number: 15475

(Decision submitted by James R. Marino of the Manhattan law firm of Kucker & Bruh, LLP, attorneys for the landlord.) Landlord applied for rent restoration based on correcting a vermin condition for which tenant's rent had been reduced. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenant appealed, claiming that the condition hadn't been corrected. The DHCR ruled against tenant. The DHCR had sent tenant a notice for inspection, and tenant didn't provide access on the inspection date.

(Decision submitted by James R. Marino of the Manhattan law firm of Kucker & Bruh, LLP, attorneys for the landlord.) Landlord applied for rent restoration based on correcting a vermin condition for which tenant's rent had been reduced. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenant appealed, claiming that the condition hadn't been corrected. The DHCR ruled against tenant. The DHCR had sent tenant a notice for inspection, and tenant didn't provide access on the inspection date.

Rodriquez: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. PG210043RT (11/8/01) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

PG210043RT.pdf83.32 KB