New Defects Irrelevant

LVT Number: 8920

Tenant complained of broken bathroom tiles, and the DRA cut tenant's rent. After completing repairs, landlord applied to restore the rent. A DHCR inspector found broken tiles, and the DRA denied landlord's application. Landlord appealed, arguing that he'd repaired the tiles, and that tenant had signed a letter stating he was satisfied with the repairs. Sometime after the repairs were completed, a fire damaged tenant's apartment, necessitating additional tile repairs. Landlord argued that tenant refused access to repair those broken tiles. The DHCR ruled for landlord.

Tenant complained of broken bathroom tiles, and the DRA cut tenant's rent. After completing repairs, landlord applied to restore the rent. A DHCR inspector found broken tiles, and the DRA denied landlord's application. Landlord appealed, arguing that he'd repaired the tiles, and that tenant had signed a letter stating he was satisfied with the repairs. Sometime after the repairs were completed, a fire damaged tenant's apartment, necessitating additional tile repairs. Landlord argued that tenant refused access to repair those broken tiles. The DHCR ruled for landlord. The original inspection was performed over a year after landlord had made the repairs, and after the fire had damaged tenant's apartment anew. Since tenant had said, and signed a letter stating that, he was happy with the original repair work, the defects found by the inspector could only have been caused by a new condition unrelated to tenant's original claim.

28th Street Investors Co.: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No HH 420064-RO (5/17/94) [3-page document]

Downloads

HH420064-RO.pdf219.09 KB