Landlord Not Maintaining Services

LVT Number: 11437

Landlord applied for MCI rent increases based on rewiring and repiping. The DRA ruled against landlord because a building-wide rent reduction order was in effect. Landlord appealed and lost. No MCI increases were warranted because landlord hadn't restored all services as directed in a separate DRA order and falsely certified on the MCI rent increase application that it was maintaining all required services. Landlord had been advised while the MCI application was pending that it had 90 days to restore services or else the MCI application would be denied.

Landlord applied for MCI rent increases based on rewiring and repiping. The DRA ruled against landlord because a building-wide rent reduction order was in effect. Landlord appealed and lost. No MCI increases were warranted because landlord hadn't restored all services as directed in a separate DRA order and falsely certified on the MCI rent increase application that it was maintaining all required services. Landlord had been advised while the MCI application was pending that it had 90 days to restore services or else the MCI application would be denied.

26 & 34 Butler Pl. Assocs.: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. HH210100RO (12/17/96) [3-page document]

Downloads

HH210100RO.pdf159.89 KB