Landlord Can Replace Hallway Trash Pick-up with Compactor System

LVT Number: #24012

Landlord asked the DHCR for permission to modify services in its rent-regulated building. The DRA ruled for landlord, and tenants appealed. Tenants claimed that the proposed compactor system would be unsanitary, reduce natural light by sealing off some hallway windows, and cause an unsafe condition by eliminating a means of egress from the building. The DHCR ruled against tenants. If landlord fails in the future to maintain the areas around the compactor in a sanitary condition, tenants can file a complaint of reduced services.

Landlord asked the DHCR for permission to modify services in its rent-regulated building. The DRA ruled for landlord, and tenants appealed. Tenants claimed that the proposed compactor system would be unsanitary, reduce natural light by sealing off some hallway windows, and cause an unsafe condition by eliminating a means of egress from the building. The DHCR ruled against tenants. If landlord fails in the future to maintain the areas around the compactor in a sanitary condition, tenants can file a complaint of reduced services. The claimed reduction in natural light wasn't a basis to deny landlord's application. And landlord's architect stated that the exit to be closed off wasn't a required means of egress under applicable code standards. There was also proof that DOB had approved the layout and design of the proposed system. Tenants submitted no proof to the contrary.

725 Riverside Drive: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket No. ZB430045RT (2/24/12) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

ZB430045RT.pdf75.84 KB