Discontinuance of Rooftop Trampoline Was Minor Condition

LVT Number: #25124

(Decision submitted by Jeffrey Goldman, Esq., attorney for the landlord.)

Rent-stabilized tenants complained of a reduction in building-wide services after landlord ordered them to stop using a trampoline and other recreational equipment on the roof of its 12-story apartment building. The DRA ruled against tenants. The conditions complained of were de minimis--that is, minor--in nature, in the absence of lease clauses providing for such services or formal facilities provided by landlord.

(Decision submitted by Jeffrey Goldman, Esq., attorney for the landlord.)

Rent-stabilized tenants complained of a reduction in building-wide services after landlord ordered them to stop using a trampoline and other recreational equipment on the roof of its 12-story apartment building. The DRA ruled against tenants. The conditions complained of were de minimis--that is, minor--in nature, in the absence of lease clauses providing for such services or formal facilities provided by landlord.

Various Tenants v. 140 East 46 St LLC: DRO Order No. ZG410022B (9/10/12) [3-pg. doc.]

Downloads

Landlord v Tenant.pdf418.43 KB