Conversion from Two-Family to Three-Family Doesn't Require New C of O

LVT Number: 13470

DOB issued a violation notice to landlord for a C of O violation because landlord had converted the building from a two-family to a three-family residence. The ALJ ruled for landlord, and DOB appealed. ECB ruled against DOB. Since both two-family and three-family residences are within the same use group, the law requires no new C of O in these circumstances.

DOB issued a violation notice to landlord for a C of O violation because landlord had converted the building from a two-family to a three-family residence. The ALJ ruled for landlord, and DOB appealed. ECB ruled against DOB. Since both two-family and three-family residences are within the same use group, the law requires no new C of O in these circumstances.

Jakupovic: ECB App. No. 30782 (6/30/99) [1-pg. doc.]

Downloads

30782.pdf98.37 KB