No Proof of Additional Apartment Occupant

LVT Number: #25886

Landlord applied in 2010 for high-rent/high-income deregulation of tenants' rent-stabilized apartment. The DRA ruled against landlord after finding that tenants' household income didn't exceed $175,000 in either 2008 or 2009. Landlord appealed and lost. Landlord claimed that another person also lived in the apartment with tenants and that her income should have been added to the total household income. But there was no proof that the person in question lived in the apartment in 2008 or 2009.

Landlord applied in 2010 for high-rent/high-income deregulation of tenants' rent-stabilized apartment. The DRA ruled against landlord after finding that tenants' household income didn't exceed $175,000 in either 2008 or 2009. Landlord appealed and lost. Landlord claimed that another person also lived in the apartment with tenants and that her income should have been added to the total household income. But there was no proof that the person in question lived in the apartment in 2008 or 2009. The woman's earnings statements, driver's license, motor vehicle registration, and divorce judgment all showed that she lived in Mississippi at that time.

 

93rd Street, LLC: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket No. BT410034RO (10/16/14) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

BT410034RO.pdf696.8 KB