DHCR to Reconsider Ruling That Building Hadn't Been Substantially Rehabbed
LVT Number: #32361
Landlord applied to the DHCR for a ruling that its building was exempt from rent stabilization due to substantial rehabilitation. The DRA ruled against landlord, finding that landlord hadn't proved that 75 percent of building-wide and individual apartment systems had been replaced. The DHCR denied landlord's PAR. Landlord then filed an Article 78 court appeal of the DHCR's decision. The DHCR agreed to take the case back for review. The DHCR then ruled that it would send the case back to the DRA for further consideration and a new order.
Zhu Young Corporation: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket No. KU410003RP (11/2/22)[3-pg. document]