Work Relating to Penthouse Addition Disallowed in Connection with Roof MCI

March 30, 2017

LVT Number: #27592

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on installation of a new roof. The DRA ruled against landlord. Landlord appealed and won, in part. Items claimed by landlord to be related to the MCI were still disallowed. These included a roof deck, roof pavers, tree pruning, engineers, engineering services, landmark approval, and building department expediter relating to a new penthouse addition. These didn’t qualify for an MCI rent hike. But the DHCR otherwise granted an MCI rent hike for the new roof installation. 

 

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on installation of a new roof. The DRA ruled against landlord. Landlord appealed and won, in part. Items claimed by landlord to be related to the MCI were still disallowed. These included a roof deck, roof pavers, tree pruning, engineers, engineering services, landmark approval, and building department expediter relating to a new penthouse addition. These didn’t qualify for an MCI rent hike. But the DHCR otherwise granted an MCI rent hike for the new roof installation. 

 
Holliswood 90 LLC: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket No. ES410047RO (2/17/17) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

ES410047RO (ES410010RO).pdf913.12 KB

Topics

More like this