Tenants Question Quality of New Roof

LVT Number: 9057

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on the installation of a new roof. The DRA approved the application, and tenants appealed. Tenants argued that the new roof was defective because it buckled, blistered, and lifted at the seams. The DHCR ruled for landlord. Landlord had complied with all requirements for an MCI. Also, the roof defects didn't cause any leaks.

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on the installation of a new roof. The DRA approved the application, and tenants appealed. Tenants argued that the new roof was defective because it buckled, blistered, and lifted at the seams. The DHCR ruled for landlord. Landlord had complied with all requirements for an MCI. Also, the roof defects didn't cause any leaks.

Various Tenants of 3010 Grand Concourse: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. GG 610032-RT (7/15/94) [3-page document]

Downloads

GG610032-RT.pdf182.52 KB