Tenant Remains Rent Stabilized Due to Improper J-51 Lease Riders

LVT Number: #19817

Landlord sued to evict tenant after the lease expiration, claiming that tenant's apartment was unregulated after expiration of the building's J-51 tax benefits. Tenant claimed that he was rent stabilized because he had received improper J-51 lease riders. The court ruled for tenant and dismissed the case. Landlord appealed and lost. Tenant's J-51 lease riders didn't properly notify tenant that the apartment would be deregulated at the end of the tax abatement period.

Landlord sued to evict tenant after the lease expiration, claiming that tenant's apartment was unregulated after expiration of the building's J-51 tax benefits. Tenant claimed that he was rent stabilized because he had received improper J-51 lease riders. The court ruled for tenant and dismissed the case. Landlord appealed and lost. Tenant's J-51 lease riders didn't properly notify tenant that the apartment would be deregulated at the end of the tax abatement period. Tenant's original lease rider stated that the J-51 benefits would expire on June 30, 1991, when the actual expiration date was June 30, 1997. Landlord claimed that this was a minor error, but landlord had improperly given tenant a fair market lease in 1995. The court also properly considered events going back more than four years to determine whether the apartment was regulated.

254 PAS Property LLC v. Gamboa: NYLJ, 8/1/07, p. 35, col. 1 (App. T. 1 Dept.; McKeon, PJ, Davis, Heitler, JJ)