Smaller Canopy

March 1, 1997

LVT Number: 11319

Tenants complained of a reduction in building-wide services. The DRA ruled for tenants, and landlord appealed, claiming that replacement of the building's entrance canopy was proper and didn't constitute a reduction in services. The DHCR ruled for landlord. Replacement of the old full-size canopy with a smaller one was a minor condition that didn't warrant a rent reduction. This condition was removed from the list of other conditions which were the reasons for the rent reduction.

Tenants complained of a reduction in building-wide services. The DRA ruled for tenants, and landlord appealed, claiming that replacement of the building's entrance canopy was proper and didn't constitute a reduction in services. The DHCR ruled for landlord. Replacement of the old full-size canopy with a smaller one was a minor condition that didn't warrant a rent reduction. This condition was removed from the list of other conditions which were the reasons for the rent reduction.

Jonathan Woodner Co.: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. IG430151RO (11/7/96) [3-page document]

Downloads

IG430151RO.pdf210.62 KB

Topics

More like this