Roof Not Completely Replaced
LVT Number: #20078
Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on the installation of a new roof. The DRA ruled against landlord, finding that the roof wasn't completely new. Landlord appealed, claiming that the roof was completely replaced. The DHCR ruled against landlord. The DHCR inspection showed that the roof didn't appear to be replaced completely and was repaired in several areas. The inspector took photographs of the roof and various apartments, which supported the DRA's finding.
536 Isham Street: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket No. VC410053RO (10/12/07) [4-pg. doc.]
Downloads
| VC 410053-RO.pdf | 1.05 MB |