Rent Hike Granted for Courtyard/Walkway Installation

May 23, 2016

LVT Number: #26986

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on installation of a courtyard/walkway with related engineering. The DRO ruled for landlord. Tenant appealed and lost. Tenant claimed that the rent increase would cause financial hardship and that building services weren’t being maintained. But tenant didn’t file any objection to the MCI application when it was before the DRO. So DHCR could not consider tenant’s appeal.

 

Landlord applied for MCI rent hikes based on installation of a courtyard/walkway with related engineering. The DRO ruled for landlord. Tenant appealed and lost. Tenant claimed that the rent increase would cause financial hardship and that building services weren’t being maintained. But tenant didn’t file any objection to the MCI application when it was before the DRO. So DHCR could not consider tenant’s appeal.

 
Marino: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket No. DU410016RT (3/11/16) [1-pg. doc.]

Downloads

DU410016RT.pdf392.9 KB

Topics

More like this