No Rent-Controlled Tenants Signed Complaint

LVT Number: 9162

(Decision submitted by James R. Marino of the Manhattan law firm of Kucker Kraus & Bruh, attorneys for the landlord.) Rent-stabilized tenant complained of reduced services. The DRA found that the elevator didn't work properly, and ordered a rent cut for the rent-stabilized tenant and all rent-controlled tenants in the building. Landlord appealed. The DHCR ruled for landlord and revoked the rent cut for the rent-controlled tenants. Since none of them had signed the original complaint, they can't benefit from the rent cut.

(Decision submitted by James R. Marino of the Manhattan law firm of Kucker Kraus & Bruh, attorneys for the landlord.) Rent-stabilized tenant complained of reduced services. The DRA found that the elevator didn't work properly, and ordered a rent cut for the rent-stabilized tenant and all rent-controlled tenants in the building. Landlord appealed. The DHCR ruled for landlord and revoked the rent cut for the rent-controlled tenants. Since none of them had signed the original complaint, they can't benefit from the rent cut.

Hakim: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. DJ 410242-RO (9/94) [3-page document]

Downloads

DJ410242-RO.pdf173.24 KB