Landlord Timely Filed PAR

LVT Number: 6717

(Decision submitted by Martin Shulman of the Manhattan law firm of Shaw & Binder, attorneys for the landlord.) Tenant complained of a rent overcharge. The DRA ruled for tenant, finding a willful rent overcharge. Landlord appealed, but its PAR was filed more than 35 days after the DRA's order was issued. Still, the DHCR ruled that landlord's PAR was timely. Landlord showed that the DRA sent landlord the order at the wrong address. Landlord filed its PAR within 35 days of receiving the order. The DHCR also found that the overcharge wasn't willful.

(Decision submitted by Martin Shulman of the Manhattan law firm of Shaw & Binder, attorneys for the landlord.) Tenant complained of a rent overcharge. The DRA ruled for tenant, finding a willful rent overcharge. Landlord appealed, but its PAR was filed more than 35 days after the DRA's order was issued. Still, the DHCR ruled that landlord's PAR was timely. Landlord showed that the DRA sent landlord the order at the wrong address. Landlord filed its PAR within 35 days of receiving the order. The DHCR also found that the overcharge wasn't willful.

[3280 Realty Corp.: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. GE 610061 RO 1/20/93)]. 5-page document.

Downloads

GE610061RO.pdf259.91 KB