Landlord Repaired Terrace Roof

LVT Number: 16277

Tenant complained of a reduction in services based on a terrace roof that wasn't being maintained. The DRA ruled for tenant and reduced his rent. Landlord later sought rent restoration based on restoration of services. The DRA ruled for landlord after an inspection. Tenant appealed, claiming that a terrace divider fence, security light about her terrace door, and lights around the terrace hadn't been restored. The DHCR ruled against tenant. These items weren't the subject of tenant's original complaint. Landlord had restored the services for which the rent reduction was granted.

Tenant complained of a reduction in services based on a terrace roof that wasn't being maintained. The DRA ruled for tenant and reduced his rent. Landlord later sought rent restoration based on restoration of services. The DRA ruled for landlord after an inspection. Tenant appealed, claiming that a terrace divider fence, security light about her terrace door, and lights around the terrace hadn't been restored. The DHCR ruled against tenant. These items weren't the subject of tenant's original complaint. Landlord had restored the services for which the rent reduction was granted.

Rosen: DHCR Admin. Rev. Dckt. No. QD410059RT (11/6/02) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

QD410059RT.pdf95.58 KB