Landlord Repaired Incinerator Chute Door

November 1, 2003

LVT Number: 16955

Tenant complained of a reduction in services. The DRA ruled for tenant and reduced his rent. Landlord later applied for rent restoration based on restoration of services. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenant appealed, claiming that landlord's application didn't state that the incinerator chute door was restored. The DHCR ruled against tenant. Landlord's application stated that all conditions had been restored, and one of the conditions listed in the rent reduction order was a missing incinerator chute door on the sixth floor of the building.

Tenant complained of a reduction in services. The DRA ruled for tenant and reduced his rent. Landlord later applied for rent restoration based on restoration of services. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenant appealed, claiming that landlord's application didn't state that the incinerator chute door was restored. The DHCR ruled against tenant. Landlord's application stated that all conditions had been restored, and one of the conditions listed in the rent reduction order was a missing incinerator chute door on the sixth floor of the building. None of the building's 62 tenants claimed that the door wasn't replaced.

Joseph: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. QL620073RT (9/12/03) [2-pg. doc.]

Downloads

QL620073RT.pdf99.77 KB

Topics

More like this