Landlord Got Extra Time to Submit Answer

LVT Number: 9211

Tenant complained of reduced services, and landlord didn't respond. A DHCR inspector confirmed the defects in tenant's apartment, and the DRA ordered a rent cut. Landlord appealed, arguing that the DHCR had given it extra time to answer tenant's complaint, but that the DRA cut the rent before the extra time was up. The DHCR revoked the rent cut. The DRA order was issued on Dec. 17, 1991, but the DHCR had given landlord until Jan. 31, 1992 to submit an answer.

Tenant complained of reduced services, and landlord didn't respond. A DHCR inspector confirmed the defects in tenant's apartment, and the DRA ordered a rent cut. Landlord appealed, arguing that the DHCR had given it extra time to answer tenant's complaint, but that the DRA cut the rent before the extra time was up. The DHCR revoked the rent cut. The DRA order was issued on Dec. 17, 1991, but the DHCR had given landlord until Jan. 31, 1992 to submit an answer.

Helmsley-Spear, Inc.: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. No. GA 410235-RO (9/3/94) [3-page document]

Downloads

GA410235-RO.pdf139.43 KB