Facade Restoration

September 30, 2005

LVT Number: 18366

Landlord applied for an MCI rent hike based on a facade restoration. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenants appealed, claiming that the facade work was merely repair and that there was no restucco on the west wall but merely spray paint. The DHCR ruled against tenants. Landlord submitted sufficient proof that the facade work included comprehensive pointing and waterproofing, and the west wall received a new stucco finish. It wasn't simply painted.

Landlord applied for an MCI rent hike based on a facade restoration. The DRA ruled for landlord. Tenants appealed, claiming that the facade work was merely repair and that there was no restucco on the west wall but merely spray paint. The DHCR ruled against tenants. Landlord submitted sufficient proof that the facade work included comprehensive pointing and waterproofing, and the west wall received a new stucco finish. It wasn't simply painted.

160 Front St.: DHCR Adm. Rev. Dckt. Nos. QE410013RO & QD410129RT (8/22/05) [6-pg. doc.]

Downloads

QE410013RO.pdf322.83 KB

Topics

More like this