Application Filed on Time

March 1, 1997

LVT Number: 11296

Landlord applied for MCI rent increases. The DHCR ruled against landlord, finding that landlord's application wasn't filed within two years of completion of the MCI. Landlord appealed. The court ruled against landlord, and landlord appealed again. The appeals court ruled for landlord. The record showed that landlord filed on time and could get an MCI rent increase for the work performed. The case was sent back to the DHCR to determine the amount of rent increase due.

Landlord applied for MCI rent increases. The DHCR ruled against landlord, finding that landlord's application wasn't filed within two years of completion of the MCI. Landlord appealed. The court ruled against landlord, and landlord appealed again. The appeals court ruled for landlord. The record showed that landlord filed on time and could get an MCI rent increase for the work performed. The case was sent back to the DHCR to determine the amount of rent increase due.

Dayton Operating Co. v. DHCR: NYLJ, p. 34, col. 6 (2/10/97) (App. Div. 2 Dept.; Rosenblatt, JP, Joy, Florio, McGinity, JJ)

Topics

More like this